If you can live with 0.32mm layer heights (which may be fine for such a big piece) it drops to 3h5m: Even using the same 0.2mm layer height with 2 perimeters, a 0.80mm nozzle will give thick, strong walls with 2 perimeters in 3h46m: Rather than worrying about the slicer, I'd suggest considering a larger nozzle size for such big prints. PrusaSlicer will print the number of perimeter walls (skin) you specify.Ī big print with multiple parts like that is going to take a long time, and you want strong parts so it doesn't all fall apart on assembly. In Cura, for example, you can specify a wall thickness and Cura will print as many perimeter walls (skin) as needed to hit that thickness. Cura and PrusaSlicer use different approaches to slicing, so something that slows down one may not affect the other as much. Not knowing what your PrusaSlicer and Cura settings are, I'm afraid I can only guess as to why you're seeing different estimate ranges. While my PrusaSlicer estimates are a bit faster than Cura when using the same hardware settings, they're not different enough that I'd consider one significantly faster than the other. Unfortunately, the AMF format you attached doesn't include settings the same way a 3MF file does, so I'm unable to look at your PrusaSlicer settings to make any recommendations. In Cura with the same adjustments, I get 6h33m: ![]() Using settings more appropriate to a big piece like that, using 3 perimeters and supports, with PrusaSlicer I get 5h56m: Using similar settings with 2 perimeters (wall line count), I get 4h55m in PrusaSlicer: I've got similar profiles worked out for Cura and PrusaSlicer. ![]() RE: printing times on cura and prusa slicer so different
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |